Case Studies
Grade AGrade A Supplier Secured

Nano TiO₂ Supplier Grade A: 3-Supplier Comparative Audit Secures Optimal Supply Chain

익명 한국 코팅 소재 제조사 (실명 비공개)

Henan Province, China (3 factories) Nano Titanium Dioxide (Nano TiO₂)CAS: 13463-67-7April 2026

Audit Background

A Korean coating material manufacturer commissioned AIMZ to select a Chinese supplier for nano TiO₂ (purity 99.8–99.98%, particle size 20–50nm) for use in UV protection and photocatalysis applications. The company had previously sourced from a single supplier but was considering diversification or replacement due to repeated quality inconsistency issues.

Inspection Results

4 Pass2 Fail

Supplier A — ISO 9001 System (Grade A, 93pts)

ISO 9001:2015 certified, complete QC documentation system, proprietary particle size analyzer (Malvern Mastersizer)

Supplier B — Insufficient QC System (Grade C)

No ISO certification, undocumented QC procedures, 100% reliance on external CMA lab for particle size testing

Supplier C — CNAS Not Certified (Grade C)

Has own lab but not CNAS certified, limited COA data reliability, 1 litigation record (contract dispute) found

Nano Particle Size Direct Measurement Comparison

Supplier A measured particle size 22–48nm — consistent with COA value (20–50nm). Suppliers B and C showed 20–35% deviation from COA values

GHS Label and Document Verification

Supplier A's COA and GHS label 6 elements confirmed complete, safety production permit valid, K-REACH registered

Contract Terms Negotiation Result

Priority supply contract with Supplier A signed for 6-month intervals. MOQ negotiated from 500kg to 200kg. Bi-monthly particle size certification data provision included as contract condition

On-Site Photos

Supplier A Production LineSupplier A Production Line
On-Site Particle Size Analyzer VerificationOn-Site Particle Size Analyzer Verification
Comparative Audit ScorecardComparative Audit Scorecard

Final Verdict

Grade A Supplier Secured

Through a 3-supplier comparative audit, one supplier with Grade A (ISO 9001, 93 points) was ultimately selected. Had the top 1–2 initial candidates been chosen without comparative audit, quality issues from particle size deviations and QC system deficiencies would likely have persisted. Alongside the audit, MOQ was successfully negotiated from 500kg to 200kg.

Key Lessons

Comparative auditing of 3 suppliers significantly improves the probability of finding the right supplier over single-supplier audits. For nano materials, COA figures alone cannot guarantee quality — direct particle size measurement is essential. Even with the same CAS number, supplier selection criteria differ based on purity, particle size, and surface treatment, so specific specifications must be defined before conducting comparative audits.

Does your supplier need verification too?

Eliminate risks before transactions through on-site audit.

Request Factory Audit
Nano TiO₂ Supplier Grade A: 3-Supplier Comparative Audit Secures Optimal Supply Chain | AIMZ Case Studies